Call Us Now

Blog

Ontario Court of Appeal Case Highlights Dangers of Missing Deadlines in Agreements of Purchase and Sale

Posted On: January, 09 2018

The Ontario Court Of Appeal held in its recent decision of 2260695 Ontario Inc. v. Invecom Associates Limited 2017 ONCA 70 that Invecom had violated the terms of their Agreement of Purchase and Sale and therefore had to forfeit its deposit.

In this case the appellant gave a $400,000 deposit to three numbered corporations (collectively referred to as the “Vendors”) in order to purchase three properties in Waterloo, Ontario. This agreement stipulated that if the transaction was not completed as a result of the purchaser’s default, then the deposit would be forfeited to the vendors.

Section 4.1 of the agreement provided conditions relating to Invecom’s obligation to close which were set to expire at 5:00pm on April 15, 2014 unless Invecom gave notice in writing that the conditions had not been satisfied or waived. Three hours before closing, Invecom proposed to extend the Condition Date for five additional days. When the agent for the vendors refused to grant the extension, Invecom refused to close. A trial between the parties later ensued over whether or not Invecom was entitled to a refund of their deposit.

A lower court judge found against Invecom and concluded that the Agreement required written notice that the conditions were not waived or satisfied. The Amending and Extending Agreement did not provide this notice and was instead merely an offer to extend the closing deadline. Therefore Invecom failed to provide notice and was not entitled to receive its deposit.

On appeal, Invecom argued that the proposed Amending and Extending Agreement served both as an offer and as notice that the conditions had not been satisfied and waived. Under a deferential standard, the Court of Appeal did not accept Invecom’s argument as the proposed agreement did not contain any language suggesting that it would serve as notice regarding these conditions.

This case clarifies the need to be aware of and comply with the deadlines in Agreements of Purchase and Sale. Parties cannot assume that a request to extend the deadline for a closing date is sufficient notice that conditions have not been met. Instead, parties must use clear and concise language stating all conditions that have not been satisfied or waived to be able to claim a return of their deposit if they fail to close a sale.

 

No feedback yet

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.
BadExcellent
(For my next comment on this site)
(Allow users to contact me through a message form -- Your email will not be revealed!)

Contact Us

RECENT NEWS & EVENTS

5 STAR REVIEWS

  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by SB

    "I just wanted to let you know how happy I am with the outcome and how very grateful I am for the guidance and support that you and your team provided.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Google user

    "Patrick James is really a great lawyer who is smart and great to deal with. He's been our litigation counsel for over 5 years on several different matters. Patrick recently gave our company great strategic advice that resulted in a big commercial litigation win for our company. He's fierce, tenacious, and really cares about getting the best outcome for his clients."
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Google user

    "Patrick is a very good lawyer. He recently successfully defended a lawsuit against my company and has pursued several litigation claims for us in the past. All claims settled input favour. Mr. James is smart and quickly gives you great strategic advice. Patrick has been a real asset to our business."
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Sandra L.

    "Andrew Wray and Patrick James recently helped settle a difficult situation for me and my family. The results were exactly what we were hoping for. They are honest, strategic and will provide you with the best advice for you and your financial situation. I highly recommend them to everyone I know."
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Mark C.

    "Their team is highly focused and incredibly professional - from our experience it would be difficult not to believe that Pinto Wray James are one of Ontario's leading Firms in Labor and Employment law. The mindful client care and complete understanding of the case eased fears and the stress that comes with any legal dispute. Expect to find high level smartly crafted legal solutions at Pinto Wray James LLP - couldn't recommend more."
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Sherry C.

    "Patrick is knowledgeable, strategic, supportive, and patient. His guidance and advice helped me to maintain focus and to keep things in perspective. His experience and keen perception provides him with an edge that allows him to assess the situation, the people involved, and to offer a strategic resolution that works best for all involved. If you ever require legal advice and assistance, I highly recommend him and his team. They will be there 100% for you."
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Christian V.

    "Patrick is a fearless advocate for diverse clients. His strategic approach, and his empathy, are what set him apart as a litigator, and champion of the underdog."
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by A Google User

    "I have no hesitation recommending Andrew Wray of Pinto Wray James LLP. He provided me with legal advice regarding an employment law issue and his council was practical and honest. Andrew's approach is very much one of blending legal excellence with good common sense. An excellent lawyer!"
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Larry S.

    "Patrick listens to his clients and shows compassion, empathy and professionalism. He cares deeply that the individual that has been wrongfully terminated gets the best judgment available to him. I would not hesitate in recommending him to friends or family."
Submit