Call Us Now

Blog

Vexatious Litigant Ruling Upheld by Appeal Court

Posted On: January, 21 2015

In a decision released in June 2013, the Ontario Court of Appeal has upheld a decision by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice declaring Mr. William Malamas to be a “vexatious litigant.”

Mr. Malamas is a former real estate agent who held a number of properties in the Danforth area of Toronto.  Mr. Malamas’ property values were significantly affected by the recession of the late 1980s and early 90s and he was involved in decades-long litigation related to his properties, which was primarily unsuccessful, and which routinely involved re-litigating issues and attempting to re-open matters that had been fully and finally resolved by settlement agreements. 

Later, between 2005 and 2011, Mr. Malamas sued 16 of the lawyers and law firms that had represented him in his 20 year long legal battle, seeking over $300 million in damages and alleging that his lawyers had deliberately caused him to lose his various legal cases.  Mr. Malamas’ pattern was to ignore various procedural rulings that applied to him, commence claims that had little or no merit, and to refuse to pay costs orders that the courts had ordered him to pay.

In June 2012, twenty-seven parties who were being sued by Mr. Malamas brought a joint and omnibus application to the Superior Court of Justice, seeking that Mr. Malamas be declared a “vexatious litigant” by the court.

The court is authorized to declare a litigant to be “vexatious” in certain narrow circumstances, however the order is considered rare, as it results in restricting a person’s access to the courts and legal processes.

In Mr. Malamas’ case, the Superior Court Justice Newbould agreed that Mr. Malamas was a vexatious litigant, based on his pattern of re-litigating the same matters, commencing claims without merit, persistently pursuing unsuccessful appeals and ignoring court rulings and costs orders.

As a result of the order, Mr. Malamas is not entitled to pursue any further legal proceedings without permission of the court.  If permission is granted by the court to pursue litigation, Mr. Malamas must pay any outstanding costs orders that apply to him, and post security for costs to the court, prior to being allowed to proceed with litigation.

 

Contact Us

RECENT NEWS & EVENTS

5 STAR REVIEWS

  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by SB

    I just wanted to let you know how happy I am with the outcome and how very grateful I am for the guidance and support that you and your team provided.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Google user

    Patrick James is really a great lawyer who is smart and great to deal with. He's been our litigation counsel for over 5 years on several different matters. Patrick recently gave our company great strategic advice that resulted in a big commercial litigation win for our company. He's fierce, tenacious, and really cares about getting the best outcome for his clients.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Google user

    Patrick is a very good lawyer. He recently successfully defended a lawsuit against my company and has pursued several litigation claims for us in the past. All claims settled input favour. Mr. James is smart and quickly gives you great strategic advice. Patrick has been a real asset to our business.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Sandra L.

    Andrew Wray and Patrick James recently helped settle a difficult situation for me and my family. The results were exactly what we were hoping for. They are honest, strategic and will provide you with the best advice for you and your financial situation. I highly recommend them to everyone I know.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Mark C.

    Their team is highly focused and incredibly professional - from our experience it would be difficult not to believe that Pinto Wray James are one of Ontario's leading Firms in Labor and Employment law. The mindful client care and complete understanding of the case eased fears and the stress that comes with any legal dispute. Expect to find high level smartly crafted legal solutions at Pinto Wray James LLP - couldn't recommend more.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Sherry C.

    Patrick is knowledgeable, strategic, supportive, and patient. His guidance and advice helped me to maintain focus and to keep things in perspective. His experience and keen perception provides him with an edge that allows him to assess the situation, the people involved, and to offer a strategic resolution that works best for all involved. If you ever require legal advice and assistance, I highly recommend him and his team. They will be there 100% for you.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Christian V.

    Patrick is a fearless advocate for diverse clients. His strategic approach, and his empathy, are what set him apart as a litigator, and champion of the underdog.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by A Google User

    I have no hesitation recommending Andrew Wray of Pinto Wray James LLP. He provided me with legal advice regarding an employment law issue and his council was practical and honest. Andrew's approach is very much one of blending legal excellence with good common sense. An excellent lawyer!
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Larry S.

    Patrick listens to his clients and shows compassion, empathy and professionalism. He cares deeply that the individual that has been wrongfully terminated gets the best judgment available to him. I would not hesitate in recommending him to friends or family.
Submit