Call Us Now

Blog

Religious Accommodation: Hertz Terminates Muslim Employees in Dispute over Prayer Breaks

Posted On: January, 21 2015

Hertz car rental company in the U.S. recently came under scrutiny when it terminated 26 Muslim employees in a dispute over prayer breaks.

Hertz and the employees’ union had previously agreed that all Muslim employees would be permitted to pray in a designated prayer area, and that they would not be required to clock out during prayer breaks. About 70 percent of Hertz’ drivers at its Seattle-Tacoma International Airport location are Muslim. The drivers make less than $10 per hour and have no benefits.

Recently, and without any warning to the union, Hertz began requiring that its employees clock out during prayer breaks. Hertz imposed the new policy citing its concern that employees were taking longer than 10 minute breaks to conduct their prayer. A number of workers were sent home for not following the new clock out rule, while many others were suspended and/or terminated.

In Ontario, Hertz’ strict prayer break policy would likely be found to be a violation of the Ontario Human Rights Code, which provides for freedom from discrimination on the basis of creed. Employers are required to accommodate religious observances, such as daily prayer, up to the point of undue hardship. The Ontario Human Rights Commission has stated that religious accommodation could require that an employer adopt a flexible policy and/or approach to break times, as well as provide its employees with a designated prayer area.

Whether a requested religious accommodation amounts to undue hardship for an employer depends on a number of factors, including actual costs and health and safety risks, if any. The undue hardship test takes into account the size of the organization and its operations, and the nature of the employer’s business and financial capabilities. Importantly, customer preferences or those of co-workers are not valid considerations under the undue hardship test.

It is likely that under Ontario law, a large employer such as Hertz would not be able to demonstrate that it had accommodated its employees’ prayer breaks up to the point of undue hardship. Employees whose rights to religious accommodation have been violated have the right to seek damages and/or reinstatement in an application to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

 

Contact Us

RECENT NEWS & EVENTS

5 STAR REVIEWS

  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by SB

    I just wanted to let you know how happy I am with the outcome and how very grateful I am for the guidance and support that you and your team provided.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Google user

    Patrick James is really a great lawyer who is smart and great to deal with. He's been our litigation counsel for over 5 years on several different matters. Patrick recently gave our company great strategic advice that resulted in a big commercial litigation win for our company. He's fierce, tenacious, and really cares about getting the best outcome for his clients.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Google user

    Patrick is a very good lawyer. He recently successfully defended a lawsuit against my company and has pursued several litigation claims for us in the past. All claims settled input favour. Mr. James is smart and quickly gives you great strategic advice. Patrick has been a real asset to our business.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Sandra L.

    Andrew Wray and Patrick James recently helped settle a difficult situation for me and my family. The results were exactly what we were hoping for. They are honest, strategic and will provide you with the best advice for you and your financial situation. I highly recommend them to everyone I know.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Mark C.

    Their team is highly focused and incredibly professional - from our experience it would be difficult not to believe that Pinto Wray James are one of Ontario's leading Firms in Labor and Employment law. The mindful client care and complete understanding of the case eased fears and the stress that comes with any legal dispute. Expect to find high level smartly crafted legal solutions at Pinto Wray James LLP - couldn't recommend more.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Sherry C.

    Patrick is knowledgeable, strategic, supportive, and patient. His guidance and advice helped me to maintain focus and to keep things in perspective. His experience and keen perception provides him with an edge that allows him to assess the situation, the people involved, and to offer a strategic resolution that works best for all involved. If you ever require legal advice and assistance, I highly recommend him and his team. They will be there 100% for you.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Christian V.

    Patrick is a fearless advocate for diverse clients. His strategic approach, and his empathy, are what set him apart as a litigator, and champion of the underdog.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by A Google User

    I have no hesitation recommending Andrew Wray of Pinto Wray James LLP. He provided me with legal advice regarding an employment law issue and his council was practical and honest. Andrew's approach is very much one of blending legal excellence with good common sense. An excellent lawyer!
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Larry S.

    Patrick listens to his clients and shows compassion, empathy and professionalism. He cares deeply that the individual that has been wrongfully terminated gets the best judgment available to him. I would not hesitate in recommending him to friends or family.
Submit