Call Us Now

Blog

“Ladies’ Nights” not Discriminatory to Men: Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

Posted On: January, 23 2015

On September 6, 2012, Kyle Maclean was asked to pay a $20 cover charge to get into his local bar, the Barking Frog in London, Ontario, while his female companions were asked to pay only $10 that evening.

This struck Mr. Maclean as unfair and last year he made an application to the Human Rights Tribunal to determine whether this differential cover charge constituted “discrimination” in contravention of Ontario’s Human Rights Code (“Code”).

Under the Code, every person has the right to equal treatment when accessing services, and this includes restaurants, bars and other businesses and facilities available to the public.  It is prohibited for service providers to discriminate on the basis of gender, race, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, among other prohibited grounds of discrimination.

The case was heard by the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario in February 2013, and the Tribunal’s decision was released in April 2013.  According to the Tribunal, the cover charge may have constituted formal differential treatment and been unfair, but it didn’t amount to substantive discrimination.

The Vice Chair rejected Mr. Maclean’s argument that charging men twice what was being charged to women perpetuated the “stereotype” or prejudicial belief that men were less worthy than women.  According to the Vice Chair, “there are many things that could be said about societal beliefs in Ontario, but the notion than men are less worthy than women is not among them.”  The Vice Chair went on to point out that the history of gender discrimination in Ontario reveals that women have fought for the right to vote and for equal pay, and that while progress has been made, ongoing discrimination against women in society is evidenced by the under-representation of women in management and positions of political power.

In the Vice Chair’s analysis, charging men more for a cover fee was not substantive discrimination when viewed in the “overall societal context” and “in light of the privileged position that men” hold in society.  And, “the notion that charging a lower cover charge for women somehow demeans men as a gender in the overall societal context does not bear scrutiny.”

The case, which can be found here, is final and is unlikely to be appealed:  Maclean v. The Barking Frog, 2013 HRTO 630.

 

Contact Us

RECENT NEWS & EVENTS

5 STAR REVIEWS

  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by SB

    I just wanted to let you know how happy I am with the outcome and how very grateful I am for the guidance and support that you and your team provided.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Google user

    Patrick James is really a great lawyer who is smart and great to deal with. He's been our litigation counsel for over 5 years on several different matters. Patrick recently gave our company great strategic advice that resulted in a big commercial litigation win for our company. He's fierce, tenacious, and really cares about getting the best outcome for his clients.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Google user

    Patrick is a very good lawyer. He recently successfully defended a lawsuit against my company and has pursued several litigation claims for us in the past. All claims settled input favour. Mr. James is smart and quickly gives you great strategic advice. Patrick has been a real asset to our business.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Sandra L.

    Andrew Wray and Patrick James recently helped settle a difficult situation for me and my family. The results were exactly what we were hoping for. They are honest, strategic and will provide you with the best advice for you and your financial situation. I highly recommend them to everyone I know.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Mark C.

    Their team is highly focused and incredibly professional - from our experience it would be difficult not to believe that Pinto Wray James are one of Ontario's leading Firms in Labor and Employment law. The mindful client care and complete understanding of the case eased fears and the stress that comes with any legal dispute. Expect to find high level smartly crafted legal solutions at Pinto Wray James LLP - couldn't recommend more.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Sherry C.

    Patrick is knowledgeable, strategic, supportive, and patient. His guidance and advice helped me to maintain focus and to keep things in perspective. His experience and keen perception provides him with an edge that allows him to assess the situation, the people involved, and to offer a strategic resolution that works best for all involved. If you ever require legal advice and assistance, I highly recommend him and his team. They will be there 100% for you.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Christian V.

    Patrick is a fearless advocate for diverse clients. His strategic approach, and his empathy, are what set him apart as a litigator, and champion of the underdog.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by A Google User

    I have no hesitation recommending Andrew Wray of Pinto Wray James LLP. He provided me with legal advice regarding an employment law issue and his council was practical and honest. Andrew's approach is very much one of blending legal excellence with good common sense. An excellent lawyer!
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Larry S.

    Patrick listens to his clients and shows compassion, empathy and professionalism. He cares deeply that the individual that has been wrongfully terminated gets the best judgment available to him. I would not hesitate in recommending him to friends or family.
Submit