Call Us Now

Blog

Pick Your Forum Wisely: The Supreme Court Affirms that Human Rights Tribunals Are Not Entitled to Review Human Rights Decisions of Other Administrative Decision Makers

Posted On: January, 21 2015

In its 2006 decision Tranchemontagne v Ontario (Director, Disability Support Program), the Supreme Court of Canada affirmed that all administrative tribunals, and not just human rights tribunals, are entitled and required to apply human legislation, unless expressly prohibited from doing so by their enabling statute.

Practically speaking, from an employment law perspective, this has meant that employees with human rights grievances against their employer are usually required to raise their human rights concerns in a grievance arbitration proceeding, when such a forum is available to them. The same principle applies to parties before other administrative proceedings, such as the Employment Standards Branch of the Ministry of Labour, and the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal, among others. This “concurrent jurisdiction” approach is based on the principle that human rights remedies must be accessible, and should be advanced in the most immediate and accessible forum.

By the same token, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario is empowered to dismiss an application, where the Tribunal is of the opinion that another proceeding has “appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.”

In a decision released in October 2011, British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v Figliola, 2011 SCC 52, the Supreme Court has clarified the test for determining whether a matter has been “appropriately dealt with” in another proceeding.

In that case, Figliola and other injured workers brought an application to the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal, arguing that BC’s Workers’ Compensation Board policy on chronic pain was contrary to the BC Human Rights Code. Figliola’s application to the BC Human Rights Tribunal was brought only after the same arguments were unsuccessfully raised by Figliola in appeals before the Workers’ Compensation Board’s Review Division and later the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal. Rather than challenge the Workers’ Compensation decisions in court through a judicial review, Figliola decided to raise the same arguments before the Human Rights Tribunal, on the grounds that the human rights issues were not appropriately dealt with in the previous Workers’ Compensation Board proceeding.

The Supreme Court dismissed Figliola’s application to the BC Human Rights Tribunal on the grounds that it was an improper collateral attack against the Workers’ Compensation Board proceeding. The Court stated that Figliola was obligated to judicially review the Workers’ Compensation proceeding, and that he was prohibited from “forum shopping” by advancing the same arguments before the Human Rights Tribunal that had been raised in the previous Workers’ Compensation proceeding.

In its decision, the Supreme Court emphasized the principle of finality, stating that the integrity of the administration of justice is undermined when parties are permitted to re-litigate the same issues in multiple forums. The Court also set out the test for determining whether a matter has been “appropriately dealt with.” Under this test, a matter will be found to have been “appropriately dealt with,” where 1) that prior proceeding or tribunal had concurrent jurisdiction to decide the legal issues; 2) when the previously decided legal issues are essentially the same as those being raised in the current proceeding before the Human Rights Tribunal; and, 3) where the parties had notice of the legal issues and the case to be met, including any human rights issues, and had an opportunity to respond.

 

Contact Us

RECENT NEWS & EVENTS

5 STAR REVIEWS

  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by SB

    I just wanted to let you know how happy I am with the outcome and how very grateful I am for the guidance and support that you and your team provided.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Google user

    Patrick James is really a great lawyer who is smart and great to deal with. He's been our litigation counsel for over 5 years on several different matters. Patrick recently gave our company great strategic advice that resulted in a big commercial litigation win for our company. He's fierce, tenacious, and really cares about getting the best outcome for his clients.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Google user

    Patrick is a very good lawyer. He recently successfully defended a lawsuit against my company and has pursued several litigation claims for us in the past. All claims settled input favour. Mr. James is smart and quickly gives you great strategic advice. Patrick has been a real asset to our business.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Sandra L.

    Andrew Wray and Patrick James recently helped settle a difficult situation for me and my family. The results were exactly what we were hoping for. They are honest, strategic and will provide you with the best advice for you and your financial situation. I highly recommend them to everyone I know.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Mark C.

    Their team is highly focused and incredibly professional - from our experience it would be difficult not to believe that Pinto Wray James are one of Ontario's leading Firms in Labor and Employment law. The mindful client care and complete understanding of the case eased fears and the stress that comes with any legal dispute. Expect to find high level smartly crafted legal solutions at Pinto Wray James LLP - couldn't recommend more.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Sherry C.

    Patrick is knowledgeable, strategic, supportive, and patient. His guidance and advice helped me to maintain focus and to keep things in perspective. His experience and keen perception provides him with an edge that allows him to assess the situation, the people involved, and to offer a strategic resolution that works best for all involved. If you ever require legal advice and assistance, I highly recommend him and his team. They will be there 100% for you.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Christian V.

    Patrick is a fearless advocate for diverse clients. His strategic approach, and his empathy, are what set him apart as a litigator, and champion of the underdog.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by A Google User

    I have no hesitation recommending Andrew Wray of Pinto Wray James LLP. He provided me with legal advice regarding an employment law issue and his council was practical and honest. Andrew's approach is very much one of blending legal excellence with good common sense. An excellent lawyer!
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Larry S.

    Patrick listens to his clients and shows compassion, empathy and professionalism. He cares deeply that the individual that has been wrongfully terminated gets the best judgment available to him. I would not hesitate in recommending him to friends or family.
Submit