Call Us Now

Blog

Employees with Parental Responsibilities are Entitled to Accommodation: Federal Court

Posted On: January, 21 2015

A decision released by the Federal Court in January 2013 confirms that employers must accommodate their employees with parental obligations to the point of undue hardship: Johnstone v A.G. (Canada).

Fiona Johnstone and her husband worked as border services officers for the Canadian Border Services Agency (“CBSA”) at Pearson Airport.  Both Ms. Johnstone and her husband were full-time employees who performed rotating and fluctuation shift work.  After she had children, Ms. Johnstone was unable to secure a child care provider that would work around her fluctuating and unpredictable schedule.  Accordingly, Ms. Johnstone requested fixed full-time hours from her employer, so that she could secure child care and continue in her career with the CBSA.

CBSA agreed to give Ms. Johnstone fixed hours on a part-time basis only, and refused to give her full-time fixed hours.  Being reduced to part-time status meant that Ms. Johnstone was not eligible for the benefits, pension, and promotion opportunities available to full-time employees.  Ms. Johnstone asked to remain on full-time status and offered to top up the pay difference to maintain her full time status, but this was denied by CBSA.

Ms. Johnstone brought a complaint to the Canadian Human Rights Commission, and the Commission’s finding that Ms. Johnstone was discriminated against on the basis of her family status was upheld by the Federal Court.

The Court found that CBSA’s refusal to grant Ms. Johnstone full-time status was arbitrary.  CBSA had accommodated its employees who requested full-time fixed schedules for religious and medical reasons; however, Ms. Johnstone’s request for full-time fixed hours was rejected without serious consideration.  The Court agreed that there would be no undue hardship to CBSA to grant Ms. Johnstone’s accommodation request.

In its decision, the Court explained that a prima facie case of discrimination is established when an employment related rule or policy “interferes with an employee’s ability to fulfill her substantial parental obligations in any realistic way.”  Once a prima facie case is established, it will be up to the employer to show that the rule or policy is a “bona fide occupational requirement” and that it could not accommodate the employee due to undue hardship, financial or otherwise.

As a remedy, the CBSA was ordered to compensate Ms. Johnstone for her lost wages and benefits, and lost pension contributions she would have received during the period in question, in addition to $35,000 in damages.

 

Contact Us

RECENT NEWS & EVENTS

5 STAR REVIEWS

  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by SB

    I just wanted to let you know how happy I am with the outcome and how very grateful I am for the guidance and support that you and your team provided.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Google user

    Patrick James is really a great lawyer who is smart and great to deal with. He's been our litigation counsel for over 5 years on several different matters. Patrick recently gave our company great strategic advice that resulted in a big commercial litigation win for our company. He's fierce, tenacious, and really cares about getting the best outcome for his clients.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Google user

    Patrick is a very good lawyer. He recently successfully defended a lawsuit against my company and has pursued several litigation claims for us in the past. All claims settled input favour. Mr. James is smart and quickly gives you great strategic advice. Patrick has been a real asset to our business.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Sandra L.

    Andrew Wray and Patrick James recently helped settle a difficult situation for me and my family. The results were exactly what we were hoping for. They are honest, strategic and will provide you with the best advice for you and your financial situation. I highly recommend them to everyone I know.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Mark C.

    Their team is highly focused and incredibly professional - from our experience it would be difficult not to believe that Pinto Wray James are one of Ontario's leading Firms in Labor and Employment law. The mindful client care and complete understanding of the case eased fears and the stress that comes with any legal dispute. Expect to find high level smartly crafted legal solutions at Pinto Wray James LLP - couldn't recommend more.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Sherry C.

    Patrick is knowledgeable, strategic, supportive, and patient. His guidance and advice helped me to maintain focus and to keep things in perspective. His experience and keen perception provides him with an edge that allows him to assess the situation, the people involved, and to offer a strategic resolution that works best for all involved. If you ever require legal advice and assistance, I highly recommend him and his team. They will be there 100% for you.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Christian V.

    Patrick is a fearless advocate for diverse clients. His strategic approach, and his empathy, are what set him apart as a litigator, and champion of the underdog.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by A Google User

    I have no hesitation recommending Andrew Wray of Pinto Wray James LLP. He provided me with legal advice regarding an employment law issue and his council was practical and honest. Andrew's approach is very much one of blending legal excellence with good common sense. An excellent lawyer!
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Larry S.

    Patrick listens to his clients and shows compassion, empathy and professionalism. He cares deeply that the individual that has been wrongfully terminated gets the best judgment available to him. I would not hesitate in recommending him to friends or family.
Submit