Call Us Now

Blog

You’re Out of Order! Civil Contempt of Court

Posted On: January, 24 2015

Civil contempt of court is defined as a private injury to a litigant arising from the opposing party’s disobedience of a court order or court process. When a court order is made by a judge requiring a litigant to do or refrain from doing some act, the court expects the litigant to obey the order. It is essential to the justice system and the rule of law that litigants comply with court orders.

 

Since, as the late Justice Lax stated in Chiang (Trustee of) v. Chaing,¹ “The courts do not have an army to enforce their orders,” the courts must rely on their power to punish for contempt of court to enforce their orders.

If a litigant has disobeyed a court order, other than for the payment of money, the opposing party may bring a contempt motion to the Superior Court of Justice seeking remedies including the performance of an act, compliance with the breached order, payment of a fine, or even imprisonment. In Ontario, contempt motions are governed by Rule 60.11 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

Typically, a litigant who has disobeyed a court order – called a “contemnor” – is given an opportunity to purge him or herself of the contempt by complying with the original court order. If the contemnor fails to do so, the judge hearing the contempt motion will convene a contempt hearing where the moving party must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the contemnor is in contempt of court. The criteria making up civil contempt are as follows:

  1. The order that was breached must state clearly and unequivocally what should and should not be done;
  2. The party who disobeys the order must do so deliberately and willfully; and
  3. The evidence must show contempt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Since one possible penalty for contempt of court is imprisonment, a contemnor has the usual procedural safeguards afforded to an accused person in a criminal trial as well as those protections afforded under section 11 of the Charter.

Contempt of court is typically a motion of last resort for a litigant who is dealing with a disobedient opposing party. However, given the gravity of the offence in the eyes of the court, it is a motion to be taken seriously.

¹(2007), 85 OR (3d) 425, 2007 (ON SC) at para 25.

 

Contact Us

RECENT NEWS & EVENTS

5 STAR REVIEWS

  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by SB

    I just wanted to let you know how happy I am with the outcome and how very grateful I am for the guidance and support that you and your team provided.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Google user

    Patrick James is really a great lawyer who is smart and great to deal with. He's been our litigation counsel for over 5 years on several different matters. Patrick recently gave our company great strategic advice that resulted in a big commercial litigation win for our company. He's fierce, tenacious, and really cares about getting the best outcome for his clients.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Google user

    Patrick is a very good lawyer. He recently successfully defended a lawsuit against my company and has pursued several litigation claims for us in the past. All claims settled input favour. Mr. James is smart and quickly gives you great strategic advice. Patrick has been a real asset to our business.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Sandra L.

    Andrew Wray and Patrick James recently helped settle a difficult situation for me and my family. The results were exactly what we were hoping for. They are honest, strategic and will provide you with the best advice for you and your financial situation. I highly recommend them to everyone I know.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Mark C.

    Their team is highly focused and incredibly professional - from our experience it would be difficult not to believe that Pinto Wray James are one of Ontario's leading Firms in Labor and Employment law. The mindful client care and complete understanding of the case eased fears and the stress that comes with any legal dispute. Expect to find high level smartly crafted legal solutions at Pinto Wray James LLP - couldn't recommend more.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Sherry C.

    Patrick is knowledgeable, strategic, supportive, and patient. His guidance and advice helped me to maintain focus and to keep things in perspective. His experience and keen perception provides him with an edge that allows him to assess the situation, the people involved, and to offer a strategic resolution that works best for all involved. If you ever require legal advice and assistance, I highly recommend him and his team. They will be there 100% for you.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Christian V.

    Patrick is a fearless advocate for diverse clients. His strategic approach, and his empathy, are what set him apart as a litigator, and champion of the underdog.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by A Google User

    I have no hesitation recommending Andrew Wray of Pinto Wray James LLP. He provided me with legal advice regarding an employment law issue and his council was practical and honest. Andrew's approach is very much one of blending legal excellence with good common sense. An excellent lawyer!
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Larry S.

    Patrick listens to his clients and shows compassion, empathy and professionalism. He cares deeply that the individual that has been wrongfully terminated gets the best judgment available to him. I would not hesitate in recommending him to friends or family.
Submit