Call Us Now

Blog

Canada’s Top Court Strikes down Prostitution Laws as Unconstitutional

Posted On: January, 23 2015

In a decision released on December 20, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada has declared that three provisions of the Criminal Code (“Code”) criminalizing various activities of sex workers are unconstitutional: Canada (Attorney General) v. Bedford, 2013 SCC 72.

The constitutional challenged was launched by Terri Jean Bedford, Amy Lebovitch, and Valerie Scott, current and/or former sex workers and activists who argued that the Code prohibitions on operating a bawdy-house, communicating for the purpose of engaging in prostitution, and living off the avails of another’s prostitution violated section 7 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Section 7 of the Charter provides that “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.”

Prostitution itself is not illegal in Canada, however the Code contains provisions that restrict the manner in which sex workers can communicate and operate their trade. Bedford argued that the three Code provisions infringed her Charter rights to security of the person, because the impugned laws prevented her and other sex workers from implementing certain safety measures, such as hiring security guards or drivers, “screening” potential clients, and other measures that that could protect them from violent clients.

The Supreme Court accepted that sex workers, especially street sex workers, are, with some exceptions, a particularly marginalized population. The Court found that the current Code provisions were unconstitutional and overbroad, as they deprived sex workers of the opportunity to implement measures to make themselves safe, creating increased risk of violence, injury and imprisonment. The Supreme Court observed that the impugned Code provisions prohibited street prostitutes, who are largely the most vulnerable sex workers and who face an alarming amount of violence, from screening clients, thereby putting them at an increased risk of violence.

The Supreme Court held that the three Code provisions infringe section 7 of the Charter and were not saved under section 1 of the Charter. The Supreme Court has suspended its declaration of invalidity for one year. This means that the constitutionally invalid Code provisions will remain in force for one year, which will give Parliament that time to enact a new legislative scheme respecting prostitution, should it choose to do so.

 

Contact Us

RECENT NEWS & EVENTS

5 STAR REVIEWS

  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by SB

    I just wanted to let you know how happy I am with the outcome and how very grateful I am for the guidance and support that you and your team provided.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Google user

    Patrick James is really a great lawyer who is smart and great to deal with. He's been our litigation counsel for over 5 years on several different matters. Patrick recently gave our company great strategic advice that resulted in a big commercial litigation win for our company. He's fierce, tenacious, and really cares about getting the best outcome for his clients.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Google user

    Patrick is a very good lawyer. He recently successfully defended a lawsuit against my company and has pursued several litigation claims for us in the past. All claims settled input favour. Mr. James is smart and quickly gives you great strategic advice. Patrick has been a real asset to our business.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Sandra L.

    Andrew Wray and Patrick James recently helped settle a difficult situation for me and my family. The results were exactly what we were hoping for. They are honest, strategic and will provide you with the best advice for you and your financial situation. I highly recommend them to everyone I know.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Mark C.

    Their team is highly focused and incredibly professional - from our experience it would be difficult not to believe that Pinto Wray James are one of Ontario's leading Firms in Labor and Employment law. The mindful client care and complete understanding of the case eased fears and the stress that comes with any legal dispute. Expect to find high level smartly crafted legal solutions at Pinto Wray James LLP - couldn't recommend more.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Sherry C.

    Patrick is knowledgeable, strategic, supportive, and patient. His guidance and advice helped me to maintain focus and to keep things in perspective. His experience and keen perception provides him with an edge that allows him to assess the situation, the people involved, and to offer a strategic resolution that works best for all involved. If you ever require legal advice and assistance, I highly recommend him and his team. They will be there 100% for you.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Christian V.

    Patrick is a fearless advocate for diverse clients. His strategic approach, and his empathy, are what set him apart as a litigator, and champion of the underdog.
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by A Google User

    I have no hesitation recommending Andrew Wray of Pinto Wray James LLP. He provided me with legal advice regarding an employment law issue and his council was practical and honest. Andrew's approach is very much one of blending legal excellence with good common sense. An excellent lawyer!
  • Rating: 5 Lawyer Toronto - 5 Star Reviews
    Pinto Wray James Reviewed by Larry S.

    Patrick listens to his clients and shows compassion, empathy and professionalism. He cares deeply that the individual that has been wrongfully terminated gets the best judgment available to him. I would not hesitate in recommending him to friends or family.
Submit